Dunno about windows 95 either - when I go to a dos box, it reports 64 meg.
Now, that would be fine , but I just upgraded from 64 to 160 (anybody want
to make me an offer on a 32meg simm?) and it still reports 64meg max. So,
himem may not be the problem. In fact, I'm not *sure* but I think my machine
is slower than before - possibly a symptom of windows 95 bloating till it
barfs - I;ll let you know *when* it does ;-(
PS - have ram prices plummeted as they have here in the UK?
I got 32meg about 9 moths ago for £28.
Yesterday I bought a 128meg sdram module for £30. Go compute!
Cheers -
Neil Smith.
------------------------------
>
> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:57:01 +0100
> From: Bernie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: Can MSDOS 6.22 support more than 64 megs of memory?
>
> "blee" wrote:
> >I was wondering if MSDOS 6.22 actually supports more than 64 megs of
> >ram, and if it does what do you have to do to get dos 6.22 to do so?
>
> You'll need a himem.sys that can support more. Easiest is probably to copy
> one from 7.x (win9x). I haven't actually had time to do so yet so I can
> only use half of my memory, but I still haven't figured out what I need
> access to 128MB RAM in DOS for.
> file://Bernie
>
>
