On 19 Mar 01 at 16:36, Howard Schwartz wrote:
>More important, is the dos 7 (equivalent I assume to a version of
>command.com and the files io.sys and msdos.sys) that comes with
>win 95 and 98 really capable of running 99% of the programs written for
>Dos versions 6X and earlier? I have heard that DOS 7 can not, in fact,
>run various ``real'' dos programs, but I do not know how extsensive the
>problem is.
>
>If Dos 7 is not adequate, I would need to create a separate partition
>for my dos 6.22 with all the programs I have come to depend on and
>enjoy.
>
>Thanks for any input,
>Howard Schwartz
I regularly read usenet group microsoft.public.basic.dos.
Some very knowlegeable DOS and QuickBasic fanatic people there think that
DOS 7 is much better than 6.21 or 6.22.
In this machine, a 133 Mhz 586, I only use DOS 7. Never had any
problem.
DOS 7 corrected some problems with the space dedicated to the enviroment,
I think.
I even modified command.com, so when it loads it shows:
"DoOrS 2000" instead of "Microsoft(r) Windows 98".
Por favor confirmar por email recepcion de esta carta. Gracias
___________________________________
Ing. Alejandro Lieber
Lima S.A.
San Martin 3808 Rosario Argentina
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 54-0341-4641219
___________________________________
