Richard Menedetter wrote:
>
> The problem with arachne is IMHO the _HARD_limit of some buffers.
> (which sure comes from memory minimalization because of the 640 K limit.
> this is where a DJGPP version would help ... not because of the 32 bit
> data, but because of the flat memory modell ...)
While you may be correct that some Arachne buffers are possibly too small,
this shouldn't be a problem with cookies as they are stored in a file with
no size limit, and that file can be accessed by a buffer as small as one
byte. Of course that is STUPID, and Arachne better NOT access any files
via a one byte buffer. :(
There is a possibliity that she has an arbitrarily small limit on the size
of a single cookie, and that should be changed if it is the case. <g>
As for minimizing total buffer size because of the 640k memory limit, that
too could be the case, but 16 bit Netscape 3.04 has no problem here.
If there isn't enough space for buffers, it's because core.exe has too
much of itself loaded at one time !
- Clarence Verge
--
- Help stamp out FATWARE. As a start visit: http://home.arachne.cz/
- The internet is infected - Windows is a VIRUS !!
--
