Clarence,
Apologies if I misunderstood ... I cannot read your last post again
because I don't save every piece of mail I get. :>
However, I would say that the applicable portions of my MIME.CFG are all
there; do you see anything missing?
file/.cnm >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe $1 -cache=$t>$2
file/.eml >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe $1 -cache=$t>$2
file/.rfc >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe $1 -cache=$t>$2
file/.mes >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe $1 -cache=$t>$2
file/.tbs >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe $1 -cache=$t>$2
file/.snt >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe $1 -cache=$t>$2
file/inbox.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -i $M*.cnm -cache=$t>$2
file/outbox.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -i $M*.tbs -cache=$t>$2
file/readmail.dgi >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe -folders $M*.* -cache=$t>$2
file/sentmail.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -i $M*.snt -cache=$t>$2
file/trashfolder.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -i $Mtrash\\*.mes -cache=$t>$2
file/reply.dgi >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe -r -q=$q -cache=$t>$2
file/resend.dgi >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe -e -q=$q -cache=$t>$2
file/forward.dgi >HTM|[115]$einsight.exe -f -q=$q -cache=$t>$2
file/movemail1.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -1 -q=$q -cache=$t>$2
file/movemail2.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -2 -q=$q -cache=$t>$2
;
;Trash mail folder management:
;people who don't like TRASH folder can copy delmail1.dgi as delmail2.dgi ..
file/delmail1.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -2 -q=$q -cache=$t>$2
file/delmail2.dgi >HTM|[130]$einsight.exe -d -q=$q -cache=$t>$2
file/emptytrash.dgi >HTM|if exist $Mtrash\\*.mes del
$Mtrash\\*.mes\n$einsight.exe -i $Mtrash\\*.mes -cache=$t>$2
-------
This I *did* check line-by-line with the same section of v1.66 mime.cfg,
and the only difference I could find is in the amount of memory set into
the brackets.
For file/readmile.dgi v1.66 has 110 vs. 115 in v1.70r3. That shouldn't
make any difference, since even while in the editor writing this
response I have 125 conventional memory available. However, I'm going
to make the change and see what, if anything, happens differently.
brb back ... it made no difference.
So now what??
l.d.
====
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 04:58:05 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2001 23:23:37 -0500, L.D. Best wrote:
>> Clarence,
>> Do you use a pure 1.70 installation? Or are you still back at < 1.70?
>> Used to be almost all the DGIs for internal tasks were batch files or
>> separate; in the latest version the majority of the DGIs have been
>> included as part of the CORE.EXE code. How? I have *no* idea...
>> And *IF* it were a matter of the files supposed to be in the
>> ../system/dgi directory and not being there, then 1.70r3 wouldn't be able
>> to do any of the stuff ... and the problem is only with the readmail.dgi
>> and only when it involves a 8+3 subdirectory in the ./mail directory [at
>> least that's the only problem I've found.
> LD, I use a pretty pure A1.70 when I use it at all, and I just checked
> and found that all the .DGIs associated with mail are still in mime.cfg
> where they always were, and the only changes to this section is the in
> the value of [nnn] which has been increased by about 5k.
> To clarify, I'm not talking about ANYTHING in .\system\dgi, I'm talking
> about MIME.,cfg.
> Check it out, and re-read my last post on the subject.
> - Clarence Verge
> - Back to using Arachne V1.62 ....
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
