Ron,
You did a no no! You got *me* to thinking!!
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001 12:14:02 +0000, Ron Clarke wrote:
<snip>
> If someone will stake me to a secure server cost, I'll do on-line
> transactions, too. That would come a bit more expensive, of course.
What precisely is "a secure server?"
I always figured that SSL required the equivalent of a .pl or .dgi or
.phwhatever program running in shell of choice. Afterall, in my shell I
have the option of using the ISP's main /bin file for stuff on forms etc
OR I can do what I have done, and have my own non-accessible directory
in my shell accout of all the goodies necessary to run forms, or require
passwords, etc.
Am I that far off-base in thinking any shell account can contain a
"secure" area/form/whatever??
l.d.
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
