On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:54:40 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> Clarence,
> Just goes to show that [as I know all too well] NS sux sometimes.
You're right LD, NS sux sometimes. Most of these big browsers suk ALL
the time. - But early NS sux not too often.
> I had no problem at either URL with Arachne. First URL *is* a "blank
> page" with a single mapped graphic ... so if NS didn't show the graphic
> you'd end up seeing nothing.
Also for me, with Arachne 1.62, I see the graphic. Why NS earlier than ?
doesn't is beyond me, but I get the feeling it has more to do with the
page than NS if both 2.02 and 3.04 can't see it.
> 2nd URL is decent sized pic.
Yup also with A1.62. Having seen the pix now I think I understand why
NS threw up. <G>
- Clarence Verge
- Back to using Arachne V1.62 ....
