On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Clarence Verge wrote:
> On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 00:54:40 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
>
> > I had no problem at either URL with Arachne. First URL *is* a "blank
> > page" with a single mapped graphic ... so if NS didn't show the graphic
> > you'd end up seeing nothing.
>
> Also for me, with Arachne 1.62, I see the graphic. Why NS earlier than ?
> doesn't is beyond me, but I get the feeling it has more to do with the
> page than NS if both 2.02 and 3.04 can't see it.
>
> > 2nd URL is decent sized pic.
>
> Yup also with A1.62. Having seen the pix now I think I understand why
> NS threw up. <G>
There are several HTML errors but THE error which makes
Netscape 3.x show a blank page is the absence of the
</table> tag, the addition of which makes it all better.
http://wizard.dyndns.org/interactivestudio.html
- Steve
