On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 18:03:33 +0200, Or Botton wrote: > What you got there is the "engine", a basic default GUI, and some > extremly basic utilities that come with it. This is not a product > that was designed to be "ran out of the box". It was, as it > appears, seposed to be sold for embadded solutions and etc'. Where > all the company really need is a working basic GUI. Who would want just a working GUI that can't run anything other than its few built-in applications when you can instead have a command line that can run everything you can run under DOS, including Windows, which is nothing more than just a very buggy DOS program? Of course it would be very nice to have a good stable and secure alternative to the Windows GUI. Without support for multi-tasking, I don't see any practical usefulness for a GUI. They just look cool and the interface appears very friendly to those who suffer from a phobia about dealing with a command line. Sam Heywood -- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
