On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 23:09:07 -0400 (EDT), Steve wrote:
> I could judge Linux Arachne 1.66 since that's the one
> I use... but to try to contrast/compare with a version
> I haven't seen in nearly two years would be futile...
> and of course I've never even seen 1.70.
> <>
> Anyway, at the heart of all this rambling is the
> message that I'm not declining. ;-)
On Wed, 01 Aug 2001 17:59:33 +0200, Or Botton wrote:
> I'd love to be the one who use all 3 systems without bias.
> Only, I cant check Linux browsers right now, because I still cant
> connect to the internet with Slackware 8. TCP/IP giving me
> hellish problems.
It is more important to get a combination of all viewpoints than
for each of us to only rate the stuff we are 'strange' for.
Let's take the Qube example. Or was 2 up. I was 2 off. That's
pretty neutral on balance. VERY far from either of our personal
positions. Add in Steve's impression and the Win wacko plus a
red herring from outer space and maybe the total might have a
more useful general meaning.<G>
It seems that W0rm has lost or missed his invitiation. <g>
- Clarence Verge
- Back to using Arachne V1.62 ....
