At 20:11 4-9-01 -0400, you wrote:
>On Wed, 05 Sep 2001 00:35:38 +0200, Flip ter Biecht wrote:
>
>> Again two infected messages from Oscar Diaz.
>
>Hey, I'm more than a little disturbed by the fact that MY NAME
>was associated with BOTH of those worm distributions.
>
>There could theoretically be some intentional association - (not by
>YOU Bart) - or I could just be paranoid. <G>
>
>Who is Oscar Diaz and what has he got against me ?
>
>-  Clarence Verge.
>-- Using Arachne 1.66 on DSL.
>
>
Well, to judge from the virus characteristics, he seems to think you (or
better, our conversation back then) are boring since he didn't bother to
open. 
But to be complete, here's the rest:

>X-XS4ALL-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 15:53:04 -0400 (AST)
>From: "Oscar Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Re: <none>  
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

>X-XS4ALL-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2001 18:27:11 -0400 (AST)
>From: "Oscar Diaz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: MORE BADTRANS!  
>X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
>X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400


Note that the last one came as a response to the warning message about the
worm; apparantly our friend Oscar was still online and Badtdrans answered
the incoming mail before he opened it. (Wonder wether he's got cable)

So mind you, it's a personal as a worm can get...

Bart

Reply via email to