What does F-prot have to say about it?
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:21:01 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
> According to F-6, the file name is majority.bat with not extensions
> beyond that.
> It is NOT a text file; it is an executable of some sort ... binary
> except for a few words here and there... including "this program cannot
> be run in DOS mode" or words to that effect.
> ====
> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 23:24:28 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> On Tue, 11 Sep 2001 20:42:11 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
>>> Anyone heard of it? I got it in the mail today. It does not run in DOS
>>> mode, or so it says. It does apparently mess with registers and other
>>> stuff.
>>> I'll be forwarding it to my chief techie.
>>> l.d.
>> Is that really the *complete* file name, "majority.bat", and is it
>> really just a text file that one who understands advanced batch
>> programs involving Windows stuff may just examine in an ascii file
>> viewer to figure out what it is supposed to do?
>> Sam Heywood
>> -- This mail was written by user of The Arachne Browser - http://arachne.cz/
> - -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
> ------------------------------
--
Glenn
http://arachne.cz/
http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/
http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
