Glenn,
I guess I may be brain dead. I didn't even check it with F-Prot before.
I downloaded the latest signature & macro files [I normally don't scan
for macros] and did a "dumb scan everything" on the RAM drive where the
unencoded file resided. No hits.
So now I have to decide if I take a risk of screwing up my 3.1 by
attempting to load the file as a "font" to see what will really happen.
It may not run in 3.1 because of some of the instructions included in it
...
I don't want to be the cat that curiousity finally did away with.
===
On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 20:26:48 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> What does F-prot have to say about it?
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2001 03:21:01 -0400, L.D. Best wrote:
>> According to F-6, the file name is majority.bat with not extensions
>> beyond that.
>> It is NOT a text file; it is an executable of some sort ... binary
>> except for a few words here and there... including "this program cannot
>> be run in DOS mode" or words to that effect.
-- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
