On Thu, 18 Oct 2001 11:40:28 +0000 (GMT), Mithgol the Webmaster wrote: >> > O.K. I'll do it for you - go watch >> > http://mithgol.complife.net/ara-bug.htm
>> Got a 404. Is that a bug ? > Damn. That's a bug. I failed to upload it yesterday. > Well... now it should work. Hit "Reload" ;-) My cache gets wiped automatically on bootup. Yes, it is present now. >> You may have a valid bug there, although I have never noticed the >> effect myself. I, and probably others, will look for it. > Okay. The thing is: it's all OK in MSIE and NC, it's bad in Arachne. That > GIFs should be clean. I see what you mean re: the sunglasses, but it is not at all clear that the problem is with Arachne. I'm not making excuses for her - it's just that sometimes the other browsers are more forgiving of some errors (which *could* be in the .GIF) and sometimes Arachne does it according to the rules. Of course, sometimes she DOESN'T. <g> > At least GIFs work on Joerg Dietze's. Any more reports? I thought I posted a direct comparison of Arachne vs GWSDOS rendering for the sources.gif but I haven't seen it on the list. :(( My original comment was that the sunglasses were transparant, and you said NO. Well, my background is black, so they LOOKED transparant. <G> > They are transparent - but it is not actual transparency, it's some > transparency added by Arachne when she rendered them. Could very well be. Could also be an effect due to the choice of BGcolor. I hope Jake will comment here. ;-) - Clarence Verge. -- Using Arachne 1.66 on DSL.
