On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 11:33:37 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote: > On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 6:52:22 GMT, Alex Venn wrote:
> <snip >> I thought that the current SMTP RFC was rfc2821 and that makes no such >> claims. According to that, a backslash indicates a quoted character >> which is in line with all of the current RFCs I'm aware of. >> You may well be right that in practice there are some non-compliant MTAs >> around, but is that any reason not to adhere to a standard ? > It makes more sense to adhere to the older standards in order to > strive forward to achieve greater advancements in backward > compatibility. > Sam Heywood Hahahahahaha !!! I LOVE IT !!! -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://freedos-32.sourceforge.net/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm
