On Fri, 01 Feb 2002 15:41:02 +0300, Mithgol the Webmaster wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 18:54:08 -0400, Clarence Verge wrote: >> On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 02:17:13 +0000, Bastiaan Edelman, PA3FFZ wrote: >> > one of the adresses is the city of Rotterdam at www.rotterdam.nl >> > Entry is denied because Arachne cannot handle frames... they say. >> They lie. >> Maybe Mithgol will set me straight, but as far as I can see >> they are only checking cookies, browser versions, >> flash capability and Windows.
> You're right. And they also check presence and version of JavaScript. And, > since that sentence about frames is located inside NOSCRIPT tag, they assume > that every frame-capable browser should also understand JavaScript. > I think masquerade won't help us much with www.rotterdam.nl, since there is no > Flash for DOS anyway. What is that: "a Flash" ???? (Bastiaan) > But the example is really good. Exactly what I've asked for. > We see now what Arachne JS should support. > *) fake (or real) browser manufacturer and operating system > *) plug-in names read through APM API (and www.rotterdam.nl should detect the > absence of Flash, and offer a Flash APM ;-)) ) > *) automatic redirection to a relative URL > *) C++ standard "?" operator > On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 21:39:15 -0600, anarkissed wrote >> I thought it said, "Loading Flash, Please Wait" (though not verbatim) But > then, my dutch would embarrass a preschooler in Holland :-) > You're lucky to have JavaScript then ;-) > Deeply yours, > M M > MM MM > M M M I T H G O L > M M http://mithgol.pp.ru/ > T H E [EMAIL PROTECTED] > W W > W W W E B M A S T E R > W W W > W W -- Arachne V1.61, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
