On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 19:07:52 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote: > On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 15:37:04 -0500, Samuel W. Heywood wrote:
>> It isn't a bother at all. What I am saying is that you can >> do just one thing if you want. Please read my post again. > I'm saying it bothers me. The download and then send rigamarol > bothers me because you can't just send. From my perspective, > it's a bother. > Now from your perspective, it's not a bother. Fine. I prefer > something different. That's all. As I have previously explained: You don't have to perform a POP3 download at all. The protocol requires only that you log in to the POP3 server before sending your outgoing messages. Whether you choose to set up your software to perform a POP3 download during the mail run is your own choice. You have to log in to the POP3 server first, but you don't have to download anything there. If you want to just "send only", then you can do that if you want. No problem! Regards, Sam Heywood -- See our Big Gizmotimetemp at -- http://banners.wunderground.com/banner/gizmotimetempbig/US/VA/Mt_Jackson.gif
