On Thu, 10 Oct 2002 17:24:33 +0000, Michael Polak wrote: > ted olausson wrote: >> >From: Glenn McCorkle >> Sent: 2/14/1997 9:46:02 AM >> >Please, >> >Have a look at the "mailer" line in the header of this message. >> >;UE == User Edition. >> >and .glennmcc to indicate who compliled this particular core.exe >> >Comments, suggestions... >> >Do you like this idea or not?
>> Does this mean that the source for arachne is open? >> If so, could i get a copy of it too.. >> If it isnt going to divide int o several distros then i see no use in >> the UE part, otherwise is it a good idea. >> >Should I also add the date it was compiled? >> >Arachne V1.71;UE.glennmcc-Oct_06,2002 >> Yes, it would make it easier to keep track of UE-updates. >> But 20021006 is maybe a slightly better approach. > But what about just adding new versioning - UE01, UE02 ...? > don't forget the string is part of User-agent: header string > in http request, it would waste bandwidth if it is too long... Yes, I did forget about it being part of the user agent string. :( So, UE01 it shall be. BRB ___ The change has been made in version.c, core.exe is now recopliled with it in-place for this message header. :)) -- Glenn http://arachne.cz/ http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/ http://www.angelfire.com/id/glenndoom/download.htm http://www.thispagecannotbedisplayed.com/
