On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 23:01:19 -0400, L.D. Best wrote: > Ray,
> You misconstrue what I said. I didn't say he should not attempt to fix > the \\ bug. What I said, and what I stand by, is that attempting to > make Arachne run on advanced platforms when it is designed for -- > practically the lifeline for -- low-end legacy non-supported by most of > the world systems, said systems neither needing or being able to > function with bloatware. Yes, but going into 2003 what's a low end legacy system? Anything running 95, 98 or ME would now be considered "legacy" systems by the mainstream. Tempis fugit. Arachne should be compatible with those no longer advanced systems that are now commonly discarded as "obsolete". Sam Ewalt Croswell, Michigan, USA -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
