On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 23:01:19 -0400, L.D. Best wrote: > Ray,
> You misconstrue what I said. I didn't say he should not attempt to fix > the \\ bug. What I said, and what I stand by, is that attempting to > make Arachne run on advanced platforms when it is designed for -- > practically the lifeline for -- low-end legacy non-supported by most of > the world systems, said systems neither needing or being able to > function with bloatware. > l.d. > P.S. Grand Solstice, Merry Xmas, Happy post-Channuka, great Kwanza, and > any other belief you have which teaches peace, tolerance, and the value > of working together > ==== > On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 15:37:10 -0800, Ray Andrews wrote: >> Hi Glenn, Michal, >>> Subject: Re: WWWMAN and Win95: bug found!!! >> Bug fix downloaded and tested OK! >> Man, I wish I could buy you guys a beer. >> Oh, and, not to gloat, but L.D, remember when you said that Glenn >> shouldn't try to fix the "\\" bug because it would turn Arachne into >> bloatware?? ... Old wwwman.exe 1.61 = 32,540 bytes >> Old wwwman.exe = 27,754 bytes >> New wwwman.exe = 27,664 bytes Bloatware?? We are getting smaller... Bastiaan >> Sorry for rubbing it in, but now Arachne can live in peace on FAT32 systems >> and might just become the browser of *choice* for many a Windows user! >> (Take *that* B.G.) >> Ray Andrews, >> Vancouver, Canada >> -- Arachne V1.71;UE01, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/ > -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
