On Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:01:10 -0700, Destiny wrote: > I run Arachne in OS/2 Warp 3 and 4. Did a 4 browser test for download > speeds. Arachne was only slightly slower than the fastest, Netscape > was slower. If you get slow download speeds, something is not set > right. I have dos settings for Arachne available if anyone wants > to try it on OS/2.
Yes Please ! They would be a big help - thank you. > For general speed running Arachne completely in a ramdisk will be > the fastest whether in dos or os/2. I have the temp and cache > running in a ramdisk with a HPFS file system drive. > HPFS is noticably faster than FAT. > Reb Thank's Laurie -- Arachne V1.71;UE01, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
