..
.
Glenn McCorkle
Really great to see your continuing interest and
efforts, Glenn.
That 512 maximum for Arachne... is that just for
the Inbox, or is that 512 max for a POP3 download,
or is that 512 maximum for all Folders combined ???
Ross Virgin
Toronto, Canada
No, you will not SARS from my e-mails.
..
..
On Tue, 27 May 2003 19:55:53 -0400, Glenn McCorkle wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003 07:53:00 -0500, Sam Ewalt wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 May 2003 15:13:40 +0930, Greg Mayman wrote:
>>>> Arachne works ok for low volume situations and is easy to setup
>>>> and use. It just has limitations. And it's not apt to be "fixed"
>>>> any time soon because of the small number of users.
>>> 1. My situation is low volume... 34 messages today is still classed as
>>> low, isn't it?
>>> 2. AFAIK Glenn McCorkle is still working on upgrades of Arachne,
>>> regardless of the low number of users. Maybe its weaknesses will be
>>> "fixed" one day.
>> Yep, 34 messages is low volume. If you had a couple of hundred to
>> sort through then Arachne's Insight would drive you crazy.
>> Yes, we can hope that improvements are coming from Glenn and perhaps
>> from others.
> Sam,
> Over 2 years ago, as a test.....sent 600 messages to my own address.
> I found then that the limit in Arachne is 512.
> What is it that you would like to be able to do in sorting of
> large numbers of messages ?
> So-long-as what you'de like is not 'too complex'.
> I'll see if I can accommodate your request.
> --
> Glenn
> http://arachne.cz/
> http://www.delorie.com/listserv/mime/
> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/
> http://www.cisnet.com/glennmcc/aqc/
-- Arachne V1.66, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
