On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Alejandro Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a 133 Mhz 80586, the following times were necesary to > read from HD a 288.000 Bytes 5 column HTML table with undefined > field width:
> From IBM PC-DOS 7.0: > Lynx for 386: 10 seconds > Arachne: 65 seconds > From Windows 95: > Opera 6.0: 10 seconds > I.E. 5.0: 22 seconds I think we've done this, previously (or something similar), and if I remember rightly, those times for Arachne improve greatly if we run Arachne from a RAMDisk. Maybe I am in error. > I think Arachne would gain a lot if compiled as a 32 bit program. > I think nobody is using Arachne in a 80286. Perhaps, when Michael gets the Arachne setup for GPL, with CVS, etc, we can fork the development to run two lines...one 16-bit and the other 32-bit....as far as I know...the LINUX Arachne is already compiled in 32-bit.. ....gregy -- This mail was sent by a user of Arachne - The Ultimate Internet Client
