On Tue, 29 Jul 2003 01:47:55 -0700, G J Feig wrote: > On Sat, 26 Jul 2003, Alejandro Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Lynx for 386: 10 seconds >> Arachne: 65 seconds > I think we've done this, previously (or something similar), and if > I remember rightly, those times for Arachne improve greatly if we > run Arachne from a RAMDisk. Maybe I am in error. Yes, it will be much faster from a RAMDisk!!!! or also much, much faster with a good disk cache setup. Without one or the other Arachne grinds away with accessing the hard drive. Sam Ewalt Croswell, Michigan, USA -- Arachne V1.70;rev.3, NON-COMMERCIAL copy, http://arachne.cz/
