On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Andrew Flegg wrote: > On 29 July 2012 20:18, Andrew Flegg <and...@bleb.org> wrote: >> >> Ah, it seems that SDD_Name(RowFunc) dispatches to an explicit set of >> functions which only support 1X and 2X. Hmm. > > These 16 functions (1bpp, 2bpp, 4bpp, 8bpp @ 1x. 2x with flags and > without flags) are all *very* similar and look like they should be > very abstractable. > > However, it's not something I've got time to do right now - and a > pretty boring task at the best of times ;-)
Abstractable, yes. Abstractable without impacting performance? Doubtful. Remember that I fought long and hard to get ArcEm to run at ARM2 speeds on an Iyonix, so I don't really want us to start doing things that will harm performance unless we've got a good reason! Of course it might be possible to use more macro trickery to reduce the amount of coude, but whether that results in the code being more readable is open to question. Cheers, - Jeffrey ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ -- arcem-devel mailing list arcem-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/arcem-devel
