On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Jan de Groot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2008-03-31 at 18:14 -0400, Jeff Mickey wrote: > > Any day is fine with me, just give me a heads up 24 or 12 hours > > beforehand, so I'm sure to have gotten the email/jabber/love. As long > > as the changes are made to community as well, I think this will be > > great! Thank you for taking this on Aaron. > > > > Final note: > > I think the history of PKGBUILD's is pretty insignificant. If you can > > give me a great use-case for PKGBUILD history, I may be swayed in this > > opinion.. but to switch away from CVS is more important than the > > history. To me, CVS is the equivalent of being stabbed in the face. > > I'd really like it to stop stabbing me. > > > > // jeff > > When keeping CVS read-only online, I see no reason to keep history. The > only reason to keep history for me is, well, to look at older revisions > of a package (when did we break this, who broke it and why is this line > here). When keeping a read-only CVS archive online, we can also check > those things out.
Agreed. We will also need to switch the web interface and I *think* that ViewVC works for both cvs and svn repos. Haven't looked to hard at it.
