On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Dan McGee wrote:
On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Eric Belanger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> in testing for both arches.
>
> Changes:
>
> - minor upstream update
>
> - patches cleanup. One of them has been merged upstream, the others didn't
> applied anymore. However, they were mostly to prevent gpm from interfering
> with some terminal apps like vim and mc. They don't seem to be necessary
> anymore as vim and mc works correctly from the tests I did.
>
> - closes FS#9949 : The /usr/lib/libgpm.so.1 symlink was present on the
> system but for unkonw reasons was no longer in the package. For this reason,
> forcing is necessary to install gpm 1.20.3. I don't know how to inform the
> users about this ( front page news? or just keep an eye on the forum/ML to
> answer user's concern)
Other than the need to force, this seems to be fine. Maybe a
pre_upgrade message that it is ok to force it? /me shrugs
I'll signoff on i686
I'll signoff for i686 as well. The force did catch me off guard
though, it might be worth a news item. I actually didn't know that
everyone would have to do it until I took a look at this signoff
email.
-Dan
Any x86_64 signoff?
I'll do a news item tonight and will post it here for a review.
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
