On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Eric Belanger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, Dan McGee wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Apr 21, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Eric Belanger > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > in testing for both arches. > > > > > > > > Changes: > > > > > > > > - minor upstream update > > > > > > > > - patches cleanup. One of them has been merged upstream, the others > didn't > > > > applied anymore. However, they were mostly to prevent gpm from > interfering > > > > with some terminal apps like vim and mc. They don't seem to be > necessary > > > > anymore as vim and mc works correctly from the tests I did. > > > > > > > > - closes FS#9949 : The /usr/lib/libgpm.so.1 symlink was present on > the > > > > system but for unkonw reasons was no longer in the package. For this > reason, > > > > forcing is necessary to install gpm 1.20.3. I don't know how to > inform the > > > > users about this ( front page news? or just keep an eye on the > forum/ML to > > > > answer user's concern) > > > > > > Other than the need to force, this seems to be fine. Maybe a > > > pre_upgrade message that it is ok to force it? /me shrugs > > > > > > I'll signoff on i686 > > > > > > > I'll signoff for i686 as well. The force did catch me off guard > > though, it might be worth a news item. I actually didn't know that > > everyone would have to do it until I took a look at this signoff > > email. > > > > -Dan > > > > > > Any x86_64 signoff? > > I'll do a news item tonight and will post it here for a review.
I can sign off. I didn't do any hard-core testing, but it broke nothing for me.
