On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:35 PM, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Oct 16, 2008 at 01:41 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Does anyone even use apm anymore? And if they do, shouldn't we discourage >>>> it? >>> >>> I'm sure someone in the wild is using it, but yes we should discourage it >>> =) >> >> well if APM is all their hardware supports... > > I don't think any hardware made after 2000 supports only APM... >
I'm just playing devils advocate. My old PII had APM suspend, no ACPI support. It was a desktop though, so I never needed the suspend functionality and I doubt there's many PII laptops out there. So yeah, I'm all for removing it.
