On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 6:23 AM, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 4:09 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 5:35 PM, James Rayner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 3:06 PM, Thayer Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> On Oct 16, 2008 at 01:41 PM, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Does anyone even use apm anymore? And if they do, shouldn't we discourage >>>>> it? >>>> >>>> I'm sure someone in the wild is using it, but yes we should discourage it >>>> =) >>> >>> well if APM is all their hardware supports... >> >> I don't think any hardware made after 2000 supports only APM... >> > > I'm just playing devils advocate. My old PII had APM suspend, no ACPI > support. It was a desktop though, so I never needed the suspend > functionality and I doubt there's many PII laptops out there. > > So yeah, I'm all for removing it.
LOL, did they even make P2 laptops? I imagine they'd be huge and heavy by today's standards
