Am 26.02.2010 14:03, schrieb Allan McRae: >> We should also remove wpa_supplicant from base. My plans were to create >> a new "base-networking" and "base-wireless" group. The base-wireless >> group would (among others) cover wpa_supplicant. > > I will leave wpa_supplicant in base until such a group is created.
Right now, neither wireless_tools, nor crda, nor iw is on base, why should wpa_supplicant be there?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
