On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: > On 18/04/10 23:20, Eric Bélanger wrote: >> >> On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Does anyone know about procinfo's version? Our package has it as version >>> 19, when the source file is procinfo-18.tar.gz and all the files inside >>> say >>> version 18. Is this a typo? >>> >> >> No idea, the patch name use 19 too. Maybe we should switch to >> procinfo-ng: http://sourceforge.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ if someone >> wants to do the work. >> > > Sure... is it actually better, or just want to be better?
No idea. That's what I meant by "doing the work". Someone will need to check if it's better and do the replacement if so. What do other > distros use? Debian is using it for their testing and unstable release. > > If it looks like this is a good replacement, I will do the packaging. > > Allan >
