On 19/04/10 11:53, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 7:12 PM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote:
On 18/04/10 23:20, Eric Bélanger wrote:
On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Allan McRae<[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know about procinfo's version? Our package has it as version
19, when the source file is procinfo-18.tar.gz and all the files inside
say
version 18. Is this a typo?
No idea, the patch name use 19 too. Maybe we should switch to
procinfo-ng: http://sourceforge.net/projects/procinfo-ng/ if someone
wants to do the work.
Sure... is it actually better, or just want to be better?
No idea. That's what I meant by "doing the work". Someone will need
to check if it's better and do the replacement if so.
What do other
distros use?
Debian is using it for their testing and unstable release.
I had just looked Debian up and saw that. That is evidence enough for
me that the -ng version is the way to go.
Allan
