On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:25:32 -0500, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 08/07/10 18:34, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:56:39 +1000, Allan McRae<[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> I will schedule this for the week starting August the 9th. This is >>>> after the KDE 4.5 release but before the first beta for GNOME 3.0. It >>>> will also give us plenty of time to clean out [testing] and perhaps >>>> get that [staging] repo running? >>> >>> I would like to implement that...but I am really unsure if people want >>> me to or not. >> >> I say go ahead and do it. I work on the principle that if no-one speaks out >> against it, then it is a good idea... > > I'll speak out against it- not super strongly, but still a -1. We had > an unstable repo for ages and it was completely underused. Now we are > establishing another repo that will probably always have to be enabled > in lockstep with [testing] anyway. I guess I just think we could use > [testing] more effectively rather than adding some new [staging] repo.
Please reread my proposal. It's completely different from the unstable repo and also includes a new policy for testing. Anyway; this wont work at all if not everybody will use it and just use testing as we do now. So for now I wont waste time on this idea as long as there was no decision. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://users.archlinux.de/~pierre
