On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Pierre Schmitz <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 07:25:32 -0500, Dan McGee <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 5:35 AM, Allan McRae <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 08/07/10 18:34, Pierre Schmitz wrote: >>>> >>>> On Thu, 08 Jul 2010 10:56:39 +1000, Allan McRae<[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> I will schedule this for the week starting August the 9th. This is >>>>> after the KDE 4.5 release but before the first beta for GNOME 3.0. It >>>>> will also give us plenty of time to clean out [testing] and perhaps >>>>> get that [staging] repo running? >>>> >>>> I would like to implement that...but I am really unsure if people want >>>> me to or not. >>> >>> I say go ahead and do it. I work on the principle that if no-one speaks out >>> against it, then it is a good idea... >> >> I'll speak out against it- not super strongly, but still a -1. We had >> an unstable repo for ages and it was completely underused. Now we are >> establishing another repo that will probably always have to be enabled >> in lockstep with [testing] anyway. I guess I just think we could use >> [testing] more effectively rather than adding some new [staging] repo. > > Please reread my proposal. It's completely different from the unstable > repo and also includes a new policy for testing. Anyway; this wont work > at all if not everybody will use it and just use testing as we do now. > So for now I wont waste time on this idea as long as there was no > decision.
Yes, part of the reason I hadn't responded before was that I didn't have time to read it back then, and it had slipped my mind. I will read it and attempt to give you more constructive feedback. -Dan
