On 19/03/12 14:52, Gaetan Bisson wrote: > [2012-03-19 08:20:34 +1000] Allan McRae: >> I think thet gnupg1 is more suited to what _ALL_ Arch systems use gpgme >> for. The simple verification of package signatures. > > Well, linux-2.6.27.62 would also be sufficient to run Arch. But we only > package modern stable upstream releases, and certain users actually make > use of their modern features. >
As I pointed out before, whether gnupg2 is a stable version or an "unstable development version" (http://www.gnupg.org/download/release_notes.en.html) is up for debate. If that gets changed by upstream, then I will have no objection to dropping gnupg1. Allan
