Am 19.03.2012 12:02, schrieb Tom Gundersen: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Gaetan Bisson <[email protected]> wrote: >> [2012-03-19 10:40:58 +0200] Ionut Biru: >>> did any of you actually asked upstream about this? :D >> >> I did this morning: >> >> http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2012-March/026641.html >> >> Let's see what happens... > > For those not subscribed, this was the answer: > http://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-devel/2012-March/026643.html
So essentially, we should use 2.0, but you always need a gpg-agent with 2.0, which will break on headless systems.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
