On 06/24/2012 11:10 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote: >>> I'd like to move 2.00 to [core] via [testing] when it is released, >>> letting the grub-bios (atm grub2-bios) replace the old grub package. >>> Adding an install message and a news item is probably a good idea at >>> the time. >>> >> >> Do not replace grub. Most users won't read the pacman output and the >> configuration syntax was changed, resulting in a non booting system. >> >> Let them move to grub-bios. >>
> Well sure, but grub-bios will be part of the grub group. Won't it > automatically replace the grub package with the group in that case? > > Ronald > I don't believe that pacman replaces a package with a group. Do we really need a group called grub? What's the use case for that? -- Ionuț
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
