On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 10:23 PM, Ionut Biru <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/24/2012 11:10 PM, Ronald van Haren wrote: > >>>> I'd like to move 2.00 to [core] via [testing] when it is released, >>>> letting the grub-bios (atm grub2-bios) replace the old grub package. >>>> Adding an install message and a news item is probably a good idea at >>>> the time. >>>> >>> >>> Do not replace grub. Most users won't read the pacman output and the >>> configuration syntax was changed, resulting in a non booting system. >>> >>> Let them move to grub-bios. >>> > >> Well sure, but grub-bios will be part of the grub group. Won't it >> automatically replace the grub package with the group in that case? >> >> Ronald >> > > I don't believe that pacman replaces a package with a group. Do we > really need a group called grub? What's the use case for that? > > -- > Ionuț > > >
sorry I meant pkgbase Ronald
