On 30 March 2014 19:38, Andrea Scarpino <and...@archlinux.org> wrote: > On Sun 30, March 16:14:17 Guillaume Alaux wrote: >> **We** (Arch Linux) do not patch anything here. We are just wondering >> which way to go between: >> 1- build from upstream OpenJDK by Oracle (the build process and result >> are kind of "dirty", it builds against included libraries that are >> shipped afterwards - libpng, libjpeg, ...) >> 2- build from upstream OpenJDK by Oracle AND upstream IcedTea on a >> pre-release version (are we OK with a pre-release on our repos? This >> could go to "testing"?) >> 3- ship an already built by Oracle binary version (not in favor of >> this one - this is what is in AUR as "jdk" and "jre") >> 4- do not ship Java 8 at all and wait for IcedTea8 stable to come out >> (when?) > > I'd say to go for 1), I don't use IcedTea at all and I guess very few people > do these days. And maybe those could use jre from AUR until icedtea8 is out. > > -- > Andrea > Arch Linux Developer
You might be talking about "icedtea-web" [0], the browser plugin that enables some Java interpretation inside browsers? This is yet another project provided by the IcedTea team. [0] http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/IcedTea-Web