On 05/05/17 at 06:58am, Jan Alexander Steffens via arch-dev-public wrote: > On Fri, May 5, 2017 at 8:29 AM Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public < > arch-dev-public@archlinux.org> wrote: > > > Problematic with 4.11, license needs to be patched I don't think this is > > legal. > > http://rglinuxtech.com/?p=1935 > > > We could patch the kernel to make the needed symbols non-GPL instead. That > at least sounds less problematic (IANAL).
There is a patch for 4.12 to undo the change from GregKH. [1] [1] https://github.com/torvalds/linux/commit/d557d1b58b3546bab2c5bc2d624c5709840e6b10.patch -- Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
