On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 21:54 +0200, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > On 2017-05-06 08:28, Pierre Schmitz wrote: > > On 05.05.2017 23:32, Bartłomiej Piotrowski wrote: > > > On 2017-05-05 08:29, Tobias Powalowski via arch-dev-public wrote: > > > > Your opinion on pushing this to [testing]. > > > > > > I can't care less about binary modules that keep causing problems. +1 > > > for having 4.11 in [testing]. > > > > > > Bartłomiej > > > > I disagree. We should not break [testing] on purpose. We actually want > > people to use [testing] to look for unknown bugs. If we want to drop > > support for the nvidia module that would be a different discussion. > > > > Greetings, > > > > Pierre > > > > There is a difference between intentional breakage caused by our > laziness (we could fix the code, but we did not) and some proprietary > blob that we don't control. The bug is the driver itself. > > Bartłomiej
We should continue to make no difference between proprietary softwares and not in our packaging quality as long as they are in our official repositories. I didn't read a reason to rush on this before getting more feedback from upstreams. Not to mention that the fix may finally land into the kernel package, which is pretty open. Cheers, -- Sébastien "Seblu" Luttringer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
