On 01/20/18 at 08:19pm, Christian Rebischke via arch-dev-public wrote: > Hello Everybody, > It's now over a half year ago that I've started working together with > sangy and pierre on our vagrant and docker images. I would like to give > you a short update on this topic. > > > The Arch Linux Vagrant images are currently be build for libvirt and > virtualbox. We have over 3800 downloads at the moment and slowly > catching up to the community based arch linux vagrant images.[1] > > My first goal has been to add some hypervisors, but due to > the fact that we have only libvirt and virtualbox in our repositories I > have dismissed this plan.
Sounds good enough, this is also easier to manage. > The automated build process works fine so far > (except some issues with qemu[2] and the dependency on punctual iso > releases on soyuz. The latter should we definitly fix. Currently the iso > images are build manually. Can we automate this somehow? I really rely > on punctual releases otherwise the automated build will fail and > somebody needs to trigger the build again manually. Happened about 1-2 > times..) I'm all for automatic builds, and the improvement where multiple people know how the ISO's are build & released. How would we however sign these builds? And is the bootstrap image also generated in the same manner? > The other topic is the docker image. Has anybody of you contact to > pierre? He doesn't answer my mails and he is the only one with access to > the repository on github. I or others can grant write access to the repository, see the owners on the Github organization. I would however first want to ask pierres about it since he irregurarly is on IRC. Are these docker builds going to be automated as well btw? Oh and testing images :-) > Sangy/Santiago[3] was so nice to speak with the docker guys. They said > they would approve our docker image and we could move it to the other > official images[4]. But for this we need to do some changes on our > docker repository on github. (As long I understood sangy correct it > would be just some new branches). This would be nice, how do we share the credentials to the docker login though? Or can we make multiple people owners? [1] https://github.com/orgs/archlinux/people -- Jelle van der Waa
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
