On 6/1/20 9:12 am, Giancarlo Razzolini wrote: > Em janeiro 5, 2020 19:25 Allan McRae via arch-dev-public escreveu: >> >> Read the original message and not the partial quote that you made. I >> explicitly said there was an exception for --overwrite type posts. >> >> But any restriction being made on posting due to not posting drafts to >> the list would be complete. >> > > Hi Allan, > > I think you're overreacting (again) for something that's not properly > coded anywhere. > And, the last time this was discussed, I have talked about cases of news > that couldn't > be brought on a-d-p for discussion. We have other places to discuss > those (staff@), but > still, until we have *clear* guidelines about this, let's not rush to > implement anything.
My apologies. I believed this had been covered on the mailing list and I am told it was only on IRC, and never passed on to the TU channel, which I will accept as an excuse despite everyone(?) involved but the poster being on both channels... > I have proposed a news entry regarding zstd, Robin did the statistics > and we've discussed this > for 2 days on #archlinux-tu. If you're looking for somebody to blame, > look no further. Take away > my news posting rights (you'll have to also take away my archweb admin > rights in this case). > > And let's properly codify this ok? Because it's not codified anywhere. I > could've asked Robin > to send an email to a-d-p, but most of the work we've done on the draft > was on a pad. This was > reviewed by quite a few people. I asked Robin to do it, because since > they pushed zstd, they > should've also be the ones doing the news entry. But I would do it > myself this week, if they > didn't. Do we really need to write down everything? Have we reached a point in the distro where common sense has stopped? Why would an announcement that affects the whole distro not be run past all team members by default? Allan