On 2010/11/1 Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: > It seems to me that Peter is leaning towards the same opinion as me, so > unless > you still have strong opinions to keep this list in 'archlinux' would > you mind > reverting the code to once again generate the full list of dependencies > (i.e. > make use of ghc's extended list of provides)? > > You are very familiar with the code in 'archlinux' by now, so it'll probably > be easiest for you to revert the change yourself. Is that all right > with you, > Remy?
I commented the relevant part of "ghc-provides.txt", reverting it back to its former state. -- Rémy. _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
