On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 07:42, Rémy Oudompheng <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010/11/1 Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: >> It seems to me that Peter is leaning towards the same opinion as me, so >> unless >> you still have strong opinions to keep this list in 'archlinux' would >> you mind >> reverting the code to once again generate the full list of dependencies >> (i.e. >> make use of ghc's extended list of provides)? >> >> You are very familiar with the code in 'archlinux' by now, so it'll probably >> be easiest for you to revert the change yourself. Is that all right >> with you, >> Remy? > > I commented the relevant part of "ghc-provides.txt", reverting it back > to its former state.
Cool! :-) /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
