On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 13:40, Rémy Oudompheng <[email protected]> wrote: > On 2010/11/10 Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: >> Peter, the work you put into AUR is very much appreciated. It's >> unfortunate that [extra] was allowed to enter the state of brokenness >> it currently is in, but that doesn't in any way detract from the value >> of your work. >> >> Based on a very small sample, it seems some of the packages in [extra] >> were updated about 11 days ago. Some of these have since been >> reverted back to the HP versions again. Is there some easy way to >> quickly go through the packages in [extra] to identify which ones >> still aren't on the HP version? >> >> /M > > Peter, I'm really sorry for the trouble. Now can you quickly tell me > if everybody agrees on me uploading these packages: > - haskell-parallel (version 3.1.0.1) > - haskell-hp-parallel (version 2.2.0.1, provides haskell-parallel=2.2.0.1) > > If so, I'll do it in a minute.
That would solve it, and I'm no Arch dev, but what's the reason for wanting haskell-parallel 3.1.0.1 in [extra] at all? /M -- Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4) magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
