On 2010/11/10 Peter Simons <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Rémy, > > > Can you quickly tell me if everybody agrees on me uploading these > > packages: > > > > - haskell-parallel (version 3.1.0.1) > > - haskell-hp-parallel (version 2.2.0.1, provides haskell-parallel=2.2.0.1) > > I'd rather have haskell-parallel-2.2.0.1 in [extra]. > > The distinction between haskell-X and haskell-hp-X sounds good in theory, > but I don't believe that the consequences of that change are sufficiently > understood, nor am I convinced that we posses a tool-chain that's capable of > taking advantage of that distinction. At this point in time, that change > looks like a lot of risks and very little payoff.
Since a lot of Hackage packages depends on parallel (with no version spec) and actually are incompatible with parallel=3.*, I'll say I agree. -- Rémy. _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
