On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 21:01, Bernardo Barros <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Magnus Therning >> Any thoughts or comments on this? >> > > But there is also cases like qtHaskell that are not straightforward to > build by hand, and it is not in hackage. That should have a [aur] if > not present in [haskell]
qtHaskell is special, because it's not on Hackage. That's why it isn't in [haskell]. > In most cases since cabal does a better job, [aur] packages should be > strongly discouraged. IMNSHO we should never look at cabal as a replacement for an Arch repo or [aur]. /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
