On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:11, Nicolas Pouillard <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 10:32 AM, Magnus Therning <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 21:01, Bernardo Barros <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Magnus Therning >>>> Any thoughts or comments on this? >>>> >>> >>> But there is also cases like qtHaskell that are not straightforward to >>> build by hand, and it is not in hackage. That should have a [aur] if >>> not present in [haskell] >> >> qtHaskell is special, because it's not on Hackage. That's why it isn't >> in [haskell]. >> >>> In most cases since cabal does a better job, [aur] packages should be >>> strongly discouraged. >> >> IMNSHO we should never look at cabal as a replacement for an Arch repo or >> [aur]. > > How do you make the distinction between using cabal-install and > [haskell] in you day-to-day use.
I don't use cabal-install, so it's simple to make the distinction :) /M -- Magnus Therning OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4 email: [email protected] jabber: [email protected] twitter: magthe http://therning.org/magnus _______________________________________________ arch-haskell mailing list [email protected] http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/arch-haskell
