Grigorios Bouzakis <[email protected]> wrote: > Seblu wrote: >> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Kwpolska <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> (a reprint of FS#24074) >>>>> The initscripts' /etc/rc.d/functions uses colors with a black >>>>> background. It does not look very nice on a transparent black >>>>> terminal. A patch is included. >>>> >>>> tomegun requested a git patch to be sent here. It's in the >>>> attachments section. >>> >>> See: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17225 >> Closed as duplicate. >> >>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1186 >> Close because issue is resolved. >> >>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996 >> Closed bevause issue is not present. >>> >> >> But i agree with greg an issue present. Just run rc with a white term >> (what should be banned). >> >> I don't have tested his patch, but it looks good. This is a well know >> error with coloring term. > > The patch reverts the one from https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1186 so it > doesnt really look good. > As Aaron said in https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996#comment53730 for > a slightly different patch: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996?getfile=4307 > "The current choices are: unreadable text on white backgrounds, or an > unattractive black block. I'll go with the unattractive and READABLE > choice here." https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996#comment53730 which applies > to this patch as well.
Errm sorry got carried away. The proposed patch is not entirely the same as any of the previous ones. ---- Greg
